KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2300 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
Case 2910-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 182 Filed 04/02/12 Page 1of2 Page ID #:7622
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP CHARLES N. FREIBERG (SBN 70890 BRIAN P. BROSNAHAN (SBN 112894)
JACOB N. FOSTER (SBN 250785) 101 California Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: “ 115) 421-6140 Facsimile: (415) 398-5030
LEVINE & MILLER
HARVEY R. LEVINE (S ts BN 61879) CRAIG A. MILLER — N 116030) LEVINE & MILLE
550 West C Street, Suite 1810
San Diego, CA 92101-8596 Telephone. \6 19) 231-9449 Facsimile: (619) 231-8638
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JOYCE WALKER, KIM BRUCE HOWLETT, and MURIEL SPOONER. on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOYCE WALKER, KIM BRUCE HOWLETT, and MURIEL SPOONER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, V. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST, a Texas corporation,
Defendant.
CLASS ACTION
CASE NO.: CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx) Formerly Case No.: 3:10-cv -04852 JSW
from Northern District of California
PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE RELIED ON IN LSW’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
District Judge James V. Selna
Date: April 16, 2012 Time: 1: Courtroom: 10C
Discovery Cutoff: November 5, 2012 Pretrial Conference: Janua 14, 2013 Trial Date: January 22, 201
PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE Case No. CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx)
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2360 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
Case 2410-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 182 Filed 04/02/12 Page2of2 Page ID
#:/7623
Plaintiffs Joyce Walker, Kim Bruce Howlett, and Muriel Spooner (“Plaintiffs”) hereby object to the following evidence presented by opposing party Life Insurance Company of the Southwest (“LSW”) in connection with the motion for leave to file a second amended complaint:
(1) Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Joel Fleming in Opposition to Plaintiff [sic] Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, at p. 4. This evidence is objected to on the ground that it is inadmissible hearsay. See, e.g., Fed. R. Ev. 802.
Plaintiffs will respectfully request the Court at the hearing on the motion to
sustain the above objection and to strike the evidence referred to above, as well as
all references to the evidence contained in LSW’s opposition brief. DATED: April 2, 2012 KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES & FRIEDMAN JiGP
By: _s/Brian P. Brosnahan Brian P. Brosnahan
PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE Case No. CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx)