KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2300
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111

Case 2910-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 182 Filed 04/02/12 Page 1of2 Page ID
#:7622

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP
CHARLES N. FREIBERG (SBN 70890
BRIAN P. BROSNAHAN (SBN 112894)

JACOB N. FOSTER (SBN 250785)
101 California Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: “ 115) 421-6140
Facsimile: (415) 398-5030

LEVINE & MILLER

HARVEY R. LEVINE (S ts BN 61879)
CRAIG A. MILLER — N 116030)
LEVINE & MILLE

550 West C Street, Suite 1810

San Diego, CA 92101-8596
Telephone. \6 19) 231-9449
Facsimile: (619) 231-8638

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JOYCE WALKER, KIM BRUCE HOWLETT,
and MURIEL SPOONER. on behalf of themselves

and all others similarly situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOYCE WALKER, KIM BRUCE
HOWLETT, and MURIEL
SPOONER, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,
V.
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
THE SOUTHWEST, a Texas
corporation,

Defendant.

CLASS ACTION

CASE NO.: CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx)
Formerly Case No.: 3:10-cv -04852
JSW

from Northern District of California

PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO
EVIDENCE RELIED ON IN
LSW’S OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

District Judge James V. Selna

Date: April 16, 2012
Time: 1:
Courtroom: 10C

Discovery Cutoff: November 5, 2012
Pretrial Conference: Janua 14, 2013
Trial Date: January 22, 201

PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE
Case No. CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx)

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2360
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111

Case 2410-cv-09198-JVS -RNB Document 182 Filed 04/02/12 Page2of2 Page ID

#:/7623

Plaintiffs Joyce Walker, Kim Bruce Howlett, and Muriel Spooner
(“Plaintiffs”) hereby object to the following evidence presented by opposing party
Life Insurance Company of the Southwest (“LSW”) in connection with the motion
for leave to file a second amended complaint:

(1) Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Joel Fleming in Opposition to Plaintiff
[sic] Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, at p. 4. This evidence
is objected to on the ground that it is inadmissible hearsay. See, e.g., Fed. R. Ev.
802.

Plaintiffs will respectfully request the Court at the hearing on the motion to

sustain the above objection and to strike the evidence referred to above, as well as

all references to the evidence contained in LSW’s opposition brief.
DATED: April 2, 2012 KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES & FRIEDMAN
JiGP

By: _s/Brian P. Brosnahan
Brian P. Brosnahan

PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE
Case No. CV 10-9198 JVS (RNBx)